+1 for both - Jaime Meritt
> -----Original Message----- > From: Glen Daniels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:18 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Axis C++ code and Committers (was Re: update on axis-c > ++) > > +1, +1 > > --Glen > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:09 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [VOTE] Axis C++ code and Committers (was Re: update > > on axis-c++) > > > > > > Dear Committers, > > > > Please VOTE +1/+0/-0/-1 as usual for the following 2 items: > > (See ballot below, i already entered James and Sanjiva's +1). > > Please don't be "silent" (just say +0). FYI, Picked the list > > of names from our web site. > > > > #1: Setup xml-axis/c++ as destination for Axis-C++ (Later we > > can move xml-axis to ws-axis) > > > > #2: Accept the following folks as Committers: > > Chaminda Divitotawela > > Nuwan Gurusinghe > > Susantha Kumara > > Damitha Kumarage > > Nadika Ranasinghe > > Sanjaya Sinharage > > Roshan Weerasuriya > > > > Active Committers: #1 #2 > > # Russell Butek [ ] [ ] > > # David Chappell [ ] [ ] > > # Glen Daniels [ ] [ ] > > # Doug Davis [ ] [ ] > > # Chris Haddad [ ] [ ] > > # Tom Jordahl [ ] [ ] > > # Steve Loughran [ ] [ ] > > # Yuhichi Nakamura [ ] [ ] > > # Sam Ruby [ ] [ ] > > # Rick Rineholt [ ] [ ] > > # Thomas Sandholm [ ] [ ] > > # Rich Scheuerle [ ] [ ] > > # Igor Sedukhin [ ] [ ] > > # Matt Seibert [ ] [ ] > > # Richard Sitze [ ] [ ] > > # Davanum Srinivas [+1] [+1] > > > > Committers Emeriti: #1 #2 > > # Vahe Amirbekyan [ ] [ ] > > # Wouter Cloetens [ ] [ ] > > # Matt Duftler [ ] [ ] > > # Steve Graham [ ] [ ] > > # Rob Jellinghaus [ ] [ ] > > # Jacek Kopecky [ ] [ ] > > # Ravi Kumar [ ] [ ] > > # Berin Loritsch [ ] [ ] > > # George Matkovits [ ] [ ] > > # Kevin Mitchell [ ] [ ] > > # Bill Nagy [ ] [ ] > > # Christopher Nelson [ ] [ ] > > # Ryo Neyama [ ] [ ] > > # Glyn Normington [ ] [ ] > > # James Snell [+1] [+1] > > # Sanjiva Weerawarana [+1] [+1] > > > > --- Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > > > I would like to give an update on the axis-c++ effort that > > we're doing > > > here in Sri Lanka. As some of you know, I have organized an > > > open-source software foundation in Sri Lanka to get local > > developers > > > to participate in open-source projects. Axis-C++ is our > > first effort. > > > This is being worked on by the following > > > folks: > > > Chaminda Divitotawela > > > Nuwan Gurusinghe > > > Susantha Kumara > > > Damitha Kumarage > > > Nadika Ranasinghe > > > Sanjaya Sinharage > > > Roshan Weerasuriya > > > Susantha, Damitha, Sanjaya and Roshan are working full-time on this > > > effort. Nuwan and Chaminda are spending 2 days a week and > > Nadika one > > > day a week. Susantha is the technical lead of the team. I work with > > > them to help understand stuff and to help guide the > > architecture etc.. > > > > > > I had previously organized a group of folks from here to work on a > > > client-side C++ impl - that is currently committed at > > > ws-axis/contrib/Axis-C++ > > > The current work has focused on the server-side. We intend > > to go back > > > to the client-side code and bring it in alignment with the > > server-side > > > code, but the work so far been on the server side. > > > > > > We had a phone call with Dims a while ago when he explained the > > > overall Axis architecture and what he wanted us to do > > before the work > > > could be moved to the mainstream. The current status is that we've > > > developed an architecture for the server side and > > prototyped most of > > > it. A draft document explaining the architecture is attached. The > > > model supports all the usual Axis concepts (WSDD, handlers, > > etc.) but > > > is a bit different in the internal guts. I assume that is not a > > > problem .. the main motivation to change was to try to move > > to a more > > > pull-oriented approach and hopefully a higher performant > > approach. All > > > of this stuff can be discussed and adjusted once we get this going > > > mainstream, of course. > > > > > > I have also attached a jar file containing the main source. The > > > attached isn't enough to compile (it doesn't include all the > > > dependencies) but enough to give you an idea of the current status. > > > > > > What I'd like to do is the following: > > > - commit the code to the main repository at ws-axis/c++/... > > > - make the authors committers > > > - run in regular mode: design, implement, etc. etc. > > > > > > Dims suggested that we take a vote on how to move forward. > > Here's my > > > +1 to the above approach. > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > Sanjiva. > > > > > > > > ATTACHMENT part 2 application/msword name=AxisServerDesign.doc > > > > > > > ATTACHMENT part 3 application/octet-stream name=axiscpp.jar > > > > > > > > ===== > > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ > > > > __________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to > > Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com > >
