Davanum Srinivas wrote:
R3 InteropTestDocLit? see http://www.whitemesa.com/r3/interop3.html
just http://www.whitemesa.com/r3/InteropTestDocLit.wsdl (from
http://www.whitemesa.com/r3/plan.html) right?
alek
-- dims
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:23:49 +0600, Srinath Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:58:14 -0500, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IMHO, we need at least one interop test. So that people can exercise
Axis2 M1 code against their favourite server impl or client impl. It
will also weed out problems in the HTTP layer like you mentioned
(problems sending messages to Axis 1.X server?).
We got it fixed via closing only the output for the socket .. (so I do
not go to HTTP commons thingy // lets make it a post M1 TODO )
I very much like the
idea of picking say Whitemesa's web client, running it against our
server and seeing that it indeed works. As i like to say, if you have
control over both ends then you can do pretty much anything to
transfer data and claim anything you want...Interop is hard and we
need to start early.
My call, let's add at least one standard interop
test that other vendors (and Axis 1.X) have and help kick the tires.
What is the exact interop I should used? I am trying
SOAP 1.2 ENDPOINTS IMPLEMENTING THE SOAP 1.2 TEST COLLECTION at
whitemessa it has complex types ..Calanders bit tedious for donw a
day or two .. is there something simpler?
Thanks
Srinath
thanks,
dims
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:32:04 +0600, Srinath Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Dims
what should we do about interops? seems it is your call!
Thanks
Srinath
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:48:12 +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Aren't samples good enough at this point? Its not a big deal to do
the interop stuff (not all, but some) .. are there doc/lit echo
type ones? Those are rather trivial to impl on the server and cannot
fail in Axis2 ;-). Client is a bit more work but also pretty
damned near impossible to fail!
I'm not happy about doing encoding interop tests when we haven't
done that bit yet (formally). However, if you are really gung ho
about it I won't get in the way!
Sanjiva.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Axis2] typos / interop tests?
Sanjiva,
We need SOME evidence we are on the right track? For me it's interop
service/client. We can write all the code we want, but if it can't be
used then it's of no use. We can put a huge disclaimer in bold,
flashing letters to send the right signal that this is just a tech
preview thingy.
-- dims
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:24:07 +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Interop tests- doing interop tests will give the wrong signal
about M1 IMO. The objective of M1 IMO is to show progress and to
give (potential Axis) developers a consistent starting point. Its
not a statement of "ready-to-use"ness by any means; there may be,
or rather will be, significant/fundamental changes after M1.
If we start implementing interop tests then we're telling that
we are "production ready"! Also, without encoding support echo-style
interop is really really damned good, esp. on the server side!
Sanjiva.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 9:55 AM
Subject: [Axis2] typos / interop tests?
Srinath,
Can you please rename:
- HandlerMetaData.java to HandlerMetadata.java (lowercase 'd')
- PhaseMetaData.java to PhaseMetadata.java (lowercase 'd')
- OmStAXBuilderTest.java to OMStAXBuilderTest.java (uppercase 'M')
Do we have any interop tests? (see http://www.whitemesa.net/)
Thanks,
dims
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
--
The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay
