yep.
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:51:18 -0500, Aleksander Slominski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > >R3 InteropTestDocLit? see http://www.whitemesa.com/r3/interop3.html > > > > > just http://www.whitemesa.com/r3/InteropTestDocLit.wsdl (from > http://www.whitemesa.com/r3/plan.html) right? > > alek > > >-- dims > > > > > >On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:23:49 +0600, Srinath Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:58:14 -0500, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>wrote: > >> > >> > >>>IMHO, we need at least one interop test. So that people can exercise > >>>Axis2 M1 code against their favourite server impl or client impl. It > >>>will also weed out problems in the HTTP layer like you mentioned > >>>(problems sending messages to Axis 1.X server?). > >>> > >>> > >>We got it fixed via closing only the output for the socket .. (so I do > >>not go to HTTP commons thingy // lets make it a post M1 TODO ) > >> > >> > >> > >>>I very much like the > >>>idea of picking say Whitemesa's web client, running it against our > >>>server and seeing that it indeed works. As i like to say, if you have > >>>control over both ends then you can do pretty much anything to > >>>transfer data and claim anything you want...Interop is hard and we > >>>need to start early. > >>> > >>> > >>>My call, let's add at least one standard interop > >>>test that other vendors (and Axis 1.X) have and help kick the tires. > >>> > >>> > >>What is the exact interop I should used? I am trying > >>SOAP 1.2 ENDPOINTS IMPLEMENTING THE SOAP 1.2 TEST COLLECTION at > >>whitemessa it has complex types ..Calanders bit tedious for donw a > >>day or two .. is there something simpler? > >>Thanks > >>Srinath > >> > >> > >> > >>>thanks, > >>>dims > >>> > >>> > >>>On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:32:04 +0600, Srinath Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>Hi Dims > >>>>what should we do about interops? seems it is your call! > >>>>Thanks > >>>>Srinath > >>>> > >>>>On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:48:12 +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana > >>>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>Aren't samples good enough at this point? Its not a big deal to do > >>>>>the interop stuff (not all, but some) .. are there doc/lit echo > >>>>>type ones? Those are rather trivial to impl on the server and cannot > >>>>>fail in Axis2 ;-). Client is a bit more work but also pretty > >>>>>damned near impossible to fail! > >>>>> > >>>>>I'm not happy about doing encoding interop tests when we haven't > >>>>>done that bit yet (formally). However, if you are really gung ho > >>>>>about it I won't get in the way! > >>>>> > >>>>>Sanjiva. > >>>>> > >>>>>----- Original Message ----- > >>>>>From: "Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>Cc: <[email protected]> > >>>>>Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 3:57 PM > >>>>>Subject: Re: [Axis2] typos / interop tests? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>Sanjiva, > >>>>>> > >>>>>>We need SOME evidence we are on the right track? For me it's interop > >>>>>>service/client. We can write all the code we want, but if it can't be > >>>>>>used then it's of no use. We can put a huge disclaimer in bold, > >>>>>>flashing letters to send the right signal that this is just a tech > >>>>>>preview thingy. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>-- dims > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:24:07 +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana > >>>>>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>Interop tests- doing interop tests will give the wrong signal > >>>>>>>about M1 IMO. The objective of M1 IMO is to show progress and to > >>>>>>>give (potential Axis) developers a consistent starting point. Its > >>>>>>>not a statement of "ready-to-use"ness by any means; there may be, > >>>>>>>or rather will be, significant/fundamental changes after M1. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>If we start implementing interop tests then we're telling that > >>>>>>>we are "production ready"! Also, without encoding support echo-style > >>>>>>>interop is really really damned good, esp. on the server side! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Sanjiva. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>----- Original Message ----- > >>>>>>>From: "Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>>>To: <[email protected]> > >>>>>>>Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 9:55 AM > >>>>>>>Subject: [Axis2] typos / interop tests? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>Srinath, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>Can you please rename: > >>>>>>>>- HandlerMetaData.java to HandlerMetadata.java (lowercase 'd') > >>>>>>>>- PhaseMetaData.java to PhaseMetadata.java (lowercase 'd') > >>>>>>>>- OmStAXBuilderTest.java to OMStAXBuilderTest.java (uppercase 'M') > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>Do we have any interop tests? (see http://www.whitemesa.net/) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>Thanks, > >>>>>>>>dims > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>-- > >>>>>>>>Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>-- > >>>>>>Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>-- > >>>Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ > >>> > >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > -- > The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay > > -- Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
