On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 07:01 +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 12:16 -0700, Dennis Sosnoski wrote: > > I'll just refer back to our earlier discussion on this topic: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=axis-dev&m=112131569306784&w=2 ;-) > > > > - Dennis > > > > +1 to using some XML Infoset binary serialization format rather than > DFDL.
I forgot to mention .. I would like to introduce a typed pull API (extending StAX) into Axis2 (and implement it the obvious way). When data binding is in place and if the data is being serialized, for non-string data this can make a big difference. A common use case is using Axis2 to deal with large numerical data sets .. if we go with a binary typed stax approach, there's no intrinsic reason that should be any slower or memory intensive than any other binary protocol approach. After v1.0, of course ;-). Sanjiva.
