+1 Thanks, Ruchith
On 8/30/05, Guillaume Sauthier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > Cheers > Guillaume > > Deepal Jayasinghe wrote: > > > here is my +1 > > > > Thanks, > > Deepal > > ................................................................ > > ~Future is Open~ > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > *From:* Eran Chinthaka <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 30, 2005 9:01 AM > > *Subject:* Re: VOTE: Name axis 1.x SVN tree "axis" and axis2 tree > > "axis2" > > > > +1 from here too. > > > > Venkat Reddy wrote: > > > >>+1 > >> > >>On 8/30/05, Glen Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>>+1 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>-----Original Message----- > >>>>From: Tom Jordahl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 4:50 PM > >>>>To: [email protected] > >>>>Cc: [email protected] > >>>>Subject: VOTE: Name axis 1.x SVN tree "axis" and axis2 tree "axis2" > >>>> > >>>>I would very much like the SVN tree to have the Java and C++ > >>>>trees for Axis 1.x named "axis", not "axis1". > >>>> > >>>>I also feel the Axis2 tree should be named "axis2", > >>>>especially since we are marking Axis2 with revision numbers > >>>>like .9 and (I assume) 1.0. > >>>> > >>>>I believe this is the most clear and concise way to organize > >>>>our source trees. > >>>> > >>>>Here is my: +1 > >>>> > >>>>-- > >>>> > >>>>Tom Jordahl > >>>> > >>>>Macromedia Server Development > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > >> > > -- Ruchith
