+1
best,
alek
Ruchith Fernando wrote:
+1
Thanks,
Ruchith
On 8/30/05, Guillaume Sauthier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
Cheers
Guillaume
Deepal Jayasinghe wrote:
here is my +1
Thanks,
Deepal
................................................................
~Future is Open~
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Eran Chinthaka <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 30, 2005 9:01 AM
*Subject:* Re: VOTE: Name axis 1.x SVN tree "axis" and axis2 tree
"axis2"
+1 from here too.
Venkat Reddy wrote:
+1
On 8/30/05, Glen Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Jordahl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 4:50 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: VOTE: Name axis 1.x SVN tree "axis" and axis2 tree "axis2"
I would very much like the SVN tree to have the Java and C++
trees for Axis 1.x named "axis", not "axis1".
I also feel the Axis2 tree should be named "axis2",
especially since we are marking Axis2 with revision numbers
like .9 and (I assume) 1.0.
I believe this is the most clear and concise way to organize
our source trees.
Here is my: +1
--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia Server Development
--
The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay
