Do we need WSDL 2.0 support for 1.0 ? I'm just asking the consensus,
please do not hammer me :-( .
Tom Jordahl wrote:
I would say
that any Axis2 1.0 would have
to fully support WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0 generation (from Java) and
consumption
(to Java). I don’t think we are there yet, particularly on the WSDL
2.0
front.
I would much
rather release early/often
with a .92, .93, .95, etc.
--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia Server Development
Hi,
Well perhaps I was too eccentric in saying 75% (actually it is a rough
number I picked without much thought and is not a reflection of the
actual
amount of funtionality we need to add) but what I feel is that there's
room for
functionality and improvements.
In my side I feel that pumps for WOM to WSDL 1.1/2.0 are important
components
that should be included. I guess others will think of bits of pieces
that are
justfiable to be included in the final version 1.0 as well ?
On
9/23/05, Sanjiva
Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Fri,
2005-09-23 at
21:58 +0600, Ajith Ranabahu wrote:
> Hi all,
> Yep I'm sure the 'first impression' is very important but frankly I
> don't think this alpha release is going to be completed in
> functionality even though I do not expect a major architectural
> change. I can think of all sorts of minor imporvements / feature
> additions that needs to be done for the other upcoming releases
and I
> would say alpha is 75% of the 1.0 as far as the functionality is
> concerned.
What's the missing 25% of functionality?? Let's make a list of missing
features; if there's really 25% missing then we cannot do an alpha
release.
Sanjiva.
--
Ajith Ranabahu
|
- Re: [Axis2] 1.0-alpha release Eran Chinthaka
-
