Re: [Axis2] Road Map for next release

Fri, 04 Nov 2005 22:18:51 -0800

Hi,
No probs... I thought we all r heading for 1.0 release....
 
Yes.... Pls PLS have a nightly build mechanism and make snapshots available in a repository.  We need it badly for projects like Kandula & Sandesha... Our users find it really hard to get Kandula2 up and running. For that they need to do a maven build of Axis2 prior to building Kandula2, which is really anoying.

Thanks,
~Thilina
 
On 11/4/05, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thilina,

This is the not last release in Axis2. What I propose is to release whatever we have so far after the last release. We don't have a nightly build mechanism also.
I saw a mail in the user list saying he likes a release after several bug fixes. and that guy knows that the bug is fixed in the SVN version and not in the last releaes.
 Remember, we all agreed to release often (and more parties ;-) ) I think we have pretty much stuff to go for the next release.

Chinthaka

Thilina Gunarathne wrote: 
Hi all,
I know this will light the flames again...
How about finalising the AxisFault issues for the next release... Support
for SOAP 1.2 fualts..
 Also ws-Addressing testing. Specially the final version..
 My two cents...
 Thanks,
~Thilina

 On 11/4/05, Tom Jordahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  
  I think it is a bit misleading to characterize what I am expecting as
being **everything**. Axis 1.x doesn't even come close to everything. But
it is still very useable.

 What I would hope is that ADB can be used with a typical WSDL found in
the wild – UDDI, Amazon.com 
<http://amazon.com/>, Google, etc, etc. If it
doesn't work with the WSDL users are likely to want to consume, then they
will just walk away. Or maybe they will figure out how to use XMLBeans.
Maybe.

 Just my 2 cents.

--

Tom Jordahl

   ------------------------------

*From:* Eran Chinthaka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 02, 2005 9:06 PM
*To:* axis-dev@ws.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: [Axis2] Road Map for next release

 One more comment.

Can you all remember that we agreed to have a "Simple" data binding
framework for Axis2, during the second Axis2 f2f ? We were very clear that
we didn't want a full data binding tool. (Glen, Dims you all were there
too.)
So Tom, its unfair for you to expect *everything* from ADB. If you want
full support use any of the existing data binding tools with Axis2. I think
the existing stuff would be far better than Axis2 as they were built by
domain experts.
So do we need to re-invent the wheel here ?




Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:

On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 14:56 -0500, Tom Jordahl wrote:



If users are trying to use the data binding and it doesn't meet their

needs, how can it be a slippery slope?





Where would you draw the line Tom? Substitution groups? Attribute

groups? Or would you not draw a line at all?



If we do all of XML Schema then we are reinventing XMLBeans or something

similar. That's clearly not the core competency of SOAP implementors; so

would that be a core part of a SOAP implementation.



I'm *really* hoping that Paul Downey's new WG [1] on schema patterns for

data binding does something useful so that we can stop this debate and

draw the line at that!



Sanjiva.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/xsdb/



--
"May the SourcE be with u"            
http://webservices.apache.org/~thilina/
http://thilinag.blogspot.com/                 http://www.bloglines.com/blog/Thilina              

Reply via email to