Please use sensible version numbering. Six months from now no one will understand why we used such an odd number. Just my two cents worth.
Rick
-------------- Original message --------------
From: Chathura Herath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> +1 for the release.
>
> Chathura
>
> On 12/28/05, jayachandra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > +1 for the release, though I don't have anything to update in wiki ;p. Hope
> > I'll have some at least for the next next release
> > And yeah 0.9652 sounds cool (my dejavu says its not that random
> > either...whatever). I guesss, beyond two decimals (or two dots if you name
> > ur builds a.b.c.d) all the numbers don't carry much significance than to
> > mean they are some nightly or hourly builds, and hence we can think somewhat
> > hackers way and name it as 0.9652 or more better as 0.9452 (to mean its a
> > 0.94 equivalent release)
> >
> > Jaya
> >
> > On 12/28/05, Ajith Ranabahu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > Here's my point. Why do we (who are human beings BTW) need to be rational
> > and logical all the way :)) We can just break the tradition and make a
> > change (and fill out the mailing list with "why .9652?" mails) just for the
> > fun of it :)
> > > Enough of the philosophy, here's the real story. During the hackathon at
> > Apachecon, Glen (I think) was mentioning something (probably about
> > versioning) and said this magical number 0.9652 (which I suppose is a
> > totally random sequence of digits which happened to be higher than .93).
> > Sanjiva caught the word and said "ah cool version number. we should do a
> > release with that". And that's why this release has this weird version
> > number :)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 12/28/05, Srinath Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > > > +1 for relase
> > > >
> > > > But why Axis2 0.9652? I would prefer 0.94 ..lets keep it logical and
> > > > simple. I do not see any need to do something fancy.
> > > >
> > > > The relase number are to give a understanding about the nature of the
> > > > relase .. lets keep it that way
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Srinath
> > > >
> > > > But why
> > > > On 12/28/05, Davanum Srinivas < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > +1 from me. Next week sounds good.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 12/27/05, Eran Chinthaka < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > > > > Hash: SHA1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > After our last release on 2nd of December, I think we did enough
> > work
> > > > > > to do the next release. We have improved some features during the
> > > > > > hackathon and after that also we improved Axis2. And there were
> > number
> > > > > > of major fixes we did after 0.93.
> > > > > > So how abt having another release, preferrably before next year, or
> > > > > > first week of January, the latest.
> > > > > > Please let me know your working schedule with Axis2. Do you want
> > some
> > > > > > more time to complete the things you are working on ? And please let
> > > > > > me know the thin gs that are completed so far as well.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And how abt naming the next release as Axis2 0.9652, rather than
> > 0.94
> > > > > > ? This is a funny number came up by Glen or Sanjiva during
> > ApacheCon.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What do you all think ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. Please let me know whether you like to have a release ?
> > > > > > 2. If yes, please propose a date
> > > > > > 3. Let me know the features or fixes you have done so far by filling
> > > > > > the wiki :
> > http://wiki.apache.org/ws/FrontPage/Axis2/releases/0.94
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Chinthaka
> > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATUR E-----
> > > > > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > iD8DBQFDsVUJjON2uBzUhh8RAsWXAKCONLCrU/36ngRFXMs3Ic57s5u/VQCgq14u
> > > > > > lGx94eHmezcQ33L9otcqz5w=
> > > > > > =sBz0
> > > > > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ajith Ranabahu
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -- Jaya
>
>
> --
> Chathura Herath
> http://www.bloglines.com/blog/chathurah
