[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-371?page=comments#action_12362291 ]
Deepal Jayasinghe commented on AXIS2-371:
-----------------------------------------
Well , I think when we generating AxisService using given WSDL , if we create
WOM and using that if we create AxisService , we are going to have one
unnecessary step , I agree that it keeps a room for supporting both WSDL 1.1
and WSDL 2.0 . In the mean while as I know WOM is not permanent solution ,
when wooden come we are going to use that. There we have to change every thing
so my feeling is its better if work directly with WSDL4J.
If you remember correct previously all the Axis* were WOM , and at the
Apache con we removed that , if we are trying to do this I think we are aging
trying to go there.
> AxisServiceBuilder should be using WOM not WSDL4J
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AXIS2-371
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-371
> Project: Apache Axis 2.0 (Axis2)
> Type: Bug
> Reporter: Davanum Srinivas
>
> Can we please standarding the WOM as the single representation for holding
> information from either WSDL1 or WSDL2? AxisServiceBuilder bypasses the WOM
> and uses wsdl4j directly.
> thanks,
> dims
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
