+1 for the proposal
But do we need to allow "Any XML junk" ? I mean string would be fine for a description rather than XML

On 1/24/06, Ruchith Fernando < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 to the description element

Thanks,
Ruchith

On 1/24/06, Chamikara Jayalath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1. Thats a nice feature.
>
>  Chamikara
>
>
> On 1/23/06, Deepal Jayasinghe < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all;
> >
> > Module author should be able to tell small description about his module
> implementation and currently we are not support that. As an example module
> author should be able to tell about the spec that the module has implemented
> and its version and etc.. , So I like to have decryption element in
> module.xml (same as service decryption in services.xml ) , when it come to
> module versioning having decryptions is very useful.
> >
> > <description>
> >            Any XML junk or just string can go here
> >  </description>
> >
> > comments .....
> >
> > Thanks,
> >  Deepal
> >
> ................................................................
> > ~Future is Open~
> >
>
>



--
Ajith Ranabahu

Reply via email to