+1. let's do it :) -- dims
On 1/31/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Fremantle wrote: > > I think there is more benefit to this than just the WS-Policy. > > > > For example, AXIOM could be used by any of a number of projects that need a > > lazily-built tree. In Synapse, we use AXIOM extensively just to parse our > > config. And also, although Synapse has a heavy dependency on Axis2, the core > > model of Synapse was built to only depend on AXIOM. So I think this is worth > > doing now. > > > > It also seems to me that Axiom is pretty stable, which motivates it. > > > > But I agree, Dims, if that was the only reason, then it would be simple to > > fix. But the circular dependency is just an outcome of AXIOM getting wider > > usage as an XML model > > > > Tuscany may also want to use AXIOM in an implementation of SDO2. > Although the SCA implementation is migrating to Axis2, it would be > better if the SDO part could just pick up AXIOM. It would help if it was > available separately. > > -- > Jeremy > > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
