On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 21:55 +0000, Steve Loughran wrote: > One caveat. Once you get to 1.0, you are making some promise of stability. > > I am still trying to get code that worked with 0.93 working on 0.95 > snapshot, it looks like the dynamic classloading stuff is using the > wrong classloader. that's the price of being bleeding edge, and once I > check in the extra diagnostics everyone will benefit. > > But once you go to 1.0, you are committing to keep things stable, both > in signature and semantics, or risk alienating a larger audience.
Absolutely +1 Steve. Once we go to 1.0, the externally visible parts are frozen .. all we can do is improve/add and possibly deprecate if a big problem has been found. I'm personally confident we're ready to go there. Sanjiva.
