Not in 1.0 Final (May 1 - tentative)...definitely(?) after that. On 4/25/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > robert lazarski wrote: > > Take a look at the axis2 migration guide - there's a doc / lit example > > there that uses --noWrapped in axis 1.x and shows the axis2 > > equivalent. IMHO that seems like the direction we're headed. > > > Are there any plans for WSDL2Java to recognize "wrapped" > document/literal style operations and generate "unwrapped" java methods > in a near future? Thanks. > > > Java2wsdl is indeed supported in axis2 . > > > > HTH, > > Robert > > http://www.braziloutsource.com > > > > On 4/25/06, *Raymond Feng* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I understand Axis1.x WSDL2Java honors doc-lit wrapped style and > > generates unwrapped java methods. The following is a quote from > > the Axis 1.3 reference guide. > > > > "W, --noWrapped > > This turns off the special treatment of what is called > > "wrapped" document/literal style operations. By default, > > WSDL2Java will recognize the following conditions: > > > > * If an input message has is a single part. > > * The part is an element. > > * The element has the same name as the operation > > * The element's complex type has no attributes > > > > When it sees this, WSDL2Java will 'unwrap' the top level > > element, and treat each of the components of the element as > > arguments to the operation. This type of WSDL is the default > > for Microsoft .NET web services, which wrap up RPC style > > arguments in this top level schema element. " > > > > > > When I tried Axis2 WSDL2Java, it seems that it always generate > > unwrapped stubs and skeletons. Is this the direction we're heading? > > > > BTW, do we have Java2WSDL support in Axis2? > > > > Thanks, > > Raymond > > > > > > > -- > Jean-Sebastien > >
-- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
