Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Not in 1.0 Final (May 1 - tentative)...definitely(?) after that.
Ok thanks, I'm curious about the question mark at the end of
definitely... Is there a definite intention to support this pattern? or
is this an open question and the direction is not know yet?
On 4/25/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert lazarski wrote:
Take a look at the axis2 migration guide - there's a doc / lit example
there that uses --noWrapped in axis 1.x and shows the axis2
equivalent. IMHO that seems like the direction we're headed.
Are there any plans for WSDL2Java to recognize "wrapped"
document/literal style operations and generate "unwrapped" java methods
in a near future? Thanks.
Java2wsdl is indeed supported in axis2 .
HTH,
Robert
http://www.braziloutsource.com
On 4/25/06, *Raymond Feng* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Hi,
I understand Axis1.x WSDL2Java honors doc-lit wrapped style and
generates unwrapped java methods. The following is a quote from
the Axis 1.3 reference guide.
"W, --noWrapped
This turns off the special treatment of what is called
"wrapped" document/literal style operations. By default,
WSDL2Java will recognize the following conditions:
* If an input message has is a single part.
* The part is an element.
* The element has the same name as the operation
* The element's complex type has no attributes
When it sees this, WSDL2Java will 'unwrap' the top level
element, and treat each of the components of the element as
arguments to the operation. This type of WSDL is the default
for Microsoft .NET web services, which wrap up RPC style
arguments in this top level schema element. "
When I tried Axis2 WSDL2Java, it seems that it always generate
unwrapped stubs and skeletons. Is this the direction we're heading?
BTW, do we have Java2WSDL support in Axis2?
Thanks,
Raymond
--
Jean-Sebastien
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
--
Jean-Sebastien
