My point is that the JAX-RPC and JAX-WS impl in a Java EE 5 container should use same SAAJ impl. If not, two implementation of one interface co-exists and that may cause some problem.
I agree with you. SAAJ is SAAJ but SAAJ impl of Axis 2 is based on Axiom. Isn't it? I think that if Axis1 and Axis 2 coexits in a Java EE 5 container, they should use one SAAJ impl (maybe SAAJ of Axis2 ) in common. This is why I addressed Axis 1 restructuring. It seems uglier (to me) to use two different SAAJ impl for JAX-RPC and JAX-WS than to use Axis1 / Axis 2 in a Java EE 5 container. Or Axis1 and Axis2 should have SAAJ plugability. On 5/24/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 15:50 +0900, Jongjin Choi wrote: > Yes, the JAX-RPC and JAXWS should have common SAAJ impl. > I don't think that JavaEE 5 spec mandate SAAJ 1.2 for JAX-RPC handlers. > They must use common SAAJ 1.3 impl. > The common SAAJ 1.3 impl for Axis 1 / Axis 2 will strike a great blow > to Axis1 impl. > (OM for Axis1 ? or Axis 1 restructuring) Not at all - SAAJ is SAAJ .. its OMness is not visible unless you care to look. Sanjiva. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
