Hi Dims; Well only way is to achieve that goal is to implement that in metadata module. What I have used is Jeff suggested us to use. With that we will not get the wsdl support.
Note : Even in simple annotation case now we are using metadata module to solve the problem for us , once they are done with wsdl support we have wsdl support too. Thanks Deepal > Deepal, > > "But in the simple annotation support (no wsdl case) , it does not have > any dependency and will only use JAM to process annotation and use RPC > MR as the MRs." > > Unfortunately the above Is not enough to pass the JSR 181 TCK :( 181 > includes wsdl processing and handlers support as well. > > -- dims > > > On 3/1/07, Deepal Jayasinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> > I think the addition of annotations itself justifies 1.2 .. that's a >> > major userbility improvement. >> > >> > Isn't that independent of JAX-WS? >> > >> hmm ,it is YES and No answer . The issue is pojo annotation uses JAX-WS >> API as well as metedat module , in the meantime there is a dependency to >> JAX-WS as well (JAXWSMessageReciver). >> >> So If the JAX-WS not in good shape to go ahead and release (I think it >> is in good shape ) , then there will be affect on annotation as well. >> >> But in the simple annotation support (no wsdl case) , it does not have >> any dependency and will only use JAM to process annotation and use RPC >> MR as the MRs. >> >> Thanks >> Deepal >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > -- Thanks, Deepal ................................................................ "The highest tower is built one brick at a time" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
