Eran Chinthaka wrote:
6. About faults, yes I also agree with you for some extent. When Deepal
initially put that we had some discussions on that.
"Why there is a separate flow to handle the Faults?"
With my understanding, the handers to be invoked when there is a fault,
could be different form the handlers that could be invoked when there is
no fault.
(Going by the definition, a flow is a collection of phases and a phase
is a collection of handlers). Now it is questionable if it is really
necessary to have different handlers for fault path or the same set of
handlers could deal with both fault cases and non fault cases.
Samisa...
--
Samisa Abeysinghe : http://www.bloglines.com/blog/samisa
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
