On 5/31/07, David Illsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Um, can you explain what the problem actually is? We support
processing headers with mustUnderstand headers, so what's the interop
problem?


I can't really remember. But it happened at the
checkMustUnderstand(msgContext);
method in the Axis2Engine. Since Axis2 does not set mustunderstand property
when the
request comes from the axis2 does not give an exception and for .Net it
gave. I may be my
mistake or anyother problem.

I suggested this as a precautionary step since if there is a problem then it
can be found at
the Axis2 to Axis2 testing.


I'd be against setting mustUnderstand=true unless there's a strong
reason as imo it'll lead to more confusion for users.

FWIW there's already a property you can set on the Options object to
force the addressing handlers to mark things mustUnderstand=true

David

On 31/05/07, Amila Suriarachchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
> Currently, the must understand property of the addressing headers do not
set
> for the
> required addressing headers. There is no problem with this, since there
is
> no compulsory requirement for that.
> But MS implementation of WS* (WSF) set these attributes.
> Therefore sometimes we get interop issues when processing the must
> understand properties. So setting
> must understand property true within the Axis2 would resolve these
> incompatibility issues easily.
>
> So shall we switch on the must understand property for all the required
> addressing headers if there is no
> reason for not to do so.
> I think it is better to do the same thing for rampart and sandesha too.
>
> if we decide to do so can someone go ahead and do the changes since I am
not
> much familiar with the addressing.
>
> thanks,
> Amila.
>
>
> --
> Amila Suriarachchi,
> WSO2 Inc.


--
David Illsley - IBM Web Services Development

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
Amila Suriarachchi,
WSO2 Inc.

Reply via email to