Hi Nandana!
Nandana Mihindukulasooriya wrote:
Hi Devs,
Rampart is in the process of providing security in the fault
flows. In order to do that,
we need to introduce security phase in to out fault flow. It is already
there in the in fault flow.
so the axis2.xml have to modified to include,
<phaseOrder type="OutFaultFlow">
<!-- user can add his own phases to this area -->
<phase name="OperationOutFaultPhase"/>
<phase name="RMPhase"/>
<phase name="PolicyDetermination"/>
<phase name="MessageOut"/>
*<phase name="Security"/>*
</phaseOrder>
I'd much rather that we bit the bullet and finally got dynamic phase
deployment working. It is ridiculous to keep changing our default
axis2.xml (think about how many already deployed versions there are, and
even how many copies we have floating around in our tests etc) when the
whole point of Modules is that they should "drop in" to your system and
require minimal, if any, configuration. I'm up for taking point on
this, and should hopefully be able to get started soon.
That said, I also think we should dispense with Fault Flows as has been
discussed a few times. They don't do much useful work and unnecessarily
complicate the configuration. There should just be "in" and "out", and
if you have a handler which really cares whether a message is a fault or
not, it should just check that in invoke().
There's my $0.02 - thoughts, devs?
--Glen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
