+1 to moving to Java 5. I think maintenance releases could be key in
keeping those users tied to Java 1.4, interested in Axis2 until
they're ready to move up to Java 5 themselves.

Jeremy

On 27/02/2008, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes I guess that makes sense.
>  However, its most likely that we would roll up whatever is in the trunk.
>
>  I guess that there might be also end up being a 1.4.1 maintenance
>  release as well.
>
>
>  Paul
>
>
>  On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Michele Mazzucco
>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > Paul,
>  >
>  >  if so, I think release 1.4 should focus on fixing as much bugs as
>  >  possible, not on adding new features.
>  >
>  >  Michele
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  On 27 Feb 2008, at 09:59, Paul Fremantle wrote:
>  >
>  >  > My concern is that I think there has been a lot of work done since the
>  >  > last release and the JDK1.4 users will never get that benefit.
>  >  >
>  >  > So - how about this for a plan.
>  >  >
>  >  > Release 1.4 asap based on JDK 1.4.
>  >  > Then do a 1.5 release *very soon after* based on JDK1.5.
>  >  >
>  >  > That way even the names match :)
>  >  >
>  >  > Axis2 1.4 can be the last major release targeted at JDK1.4.
>  >  >
>  >  > As for 1.5, I think in fact it will need two releases - once we start
>  >  > targeting 1.5 we probably need to do some 1.5 specific stuff like
>  >  > generating code that takes advantage of generics.
>  >  >
>  >  > Paul
>  >  >
>  >  > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 6:28 AM, Dennis Sosnoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >  > wrote:
>  >  >>  From my experiences working with companies moving to Axis2 I'd say
>  >  >>  about half are still using JDK 1.4. If they can't count on that
>  >  >> support
>  >  >>  being maintained I think they're likely to reconsider adopting
>  >  >> Axis2.
>  >  >>  Just having an archived 1.3 version of Axis2 won't be enough to
>  >  >> convince
>  >  >>  them, unless they're already committed to moving to JDK 1.5 anyway.
>  >  >>
>  >  >>  It seems like bad timing to give up one of the major advantages
>  >  >> of Axis2
>  >  >>  over the Glassfish code and such. So -0 from me.
>  >  >>
>  >  >>   - Dennis
>  >  >>
>  >  >>  --
>  >  >>  Dennis M. Sosnoski
>  >  >>  SOA and Web Services in Java
>  >  >>  Axis2 Training and Consulting
>  >  >>  http://www.sosnoski.com - http://www.sosnoski.co.nz
>  >  >>  Seattle, WA +1-425-939-0576 - Wellington, NZ +64-4-298-6117
>  >  >>
>  >  >>
>  >  >>
>  >  >>
>  >  >>
>  >  >>  Deepal Jayasinghe wrote:
>  >  >>> Hi all ,
>  >  >>>
>  >  >>> As you might remember few months back Glen asked the list about
>  >  >>> moving
>  >  >>> to JDK 1.5 and I think we got very positive feedback. So I
>  >  >>> thought of
>  >  >>> asking again and change the code to work with JDK 1.5 . The main
>  >  >>> reason behind sending this mail is due the dependency we have for
>  >  >>> annogen. As I can see that project is dead one and there is no
>  >  >>> development happening so I do not think it is a good idea to
>  >  >>> depend on
>  >  >>> such a project. In the meantime we have few issues with annogen as
>  >  >>> well ,first  inner class problem (I have locally fixed that both in
>  >  >>> Axis2 and Annogen will commit soon) , second is the final class
>  >  >>> problem. I request a release from annogen after the changes that
>  >  >>> Dims
>  >  >>> did , but we did not get any reply so far.
>  >  >>>
>  >  >>> We all know that we get better annotation support from JDK 1.5 so if
>  >  >>> we move to JDK 1.5 we can get rid of the annogen dependency and
>  >  >>> we can
>  >  >>> just use JDK for annotation processing.  Other problem is generic
>  >  >>> support , if we move to JDK 1.5 we can have generic support in our
>  >  >>> POJOs.  In addition to POJO we can get better concurrent support in
>  >  >>> JDK 1.5 as well.
>  >  >>>
>  >  >>> So if we move to JDK 1.5 we can get better support , and I do not
>  >  >>> think any advantage of staying in 1.4 . If some user want to use
>  >  >>> Axis2
>  >  >>> in JDK 1.4 they can happily use Axis2 1.3 , which is very stable
>  >  >>> version and working fine in 1.4 and 1.5.
>  >  >>>
>  >  >>> If any user or developers have any concern on moving to JDK 1.5
>  >  >>> please
>  >  >>> come forward and reply to this mail that will be very helpful for
>  >  >>> all
>  >  >>> of us.
>  >  >>>
>  >  >>> Here is my +1 for moving to JDK 1.5 to and release Axis2 1.4 in
>  >  >>> JDK 1.5
>  >  >>>
>  >  >>> Thank you,
>  >  >>> Deepal
>  >  >>>
>  >  >>>
>  >  >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  >>> -
>  >  >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >>>
>  >  >>
>  >  >>
>  >  >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  >>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >>
>  >  >>
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  > --
>  >  > Paul Fremantle
>  >  > Co-Founder and VP of Technical Sales, WSO2
>  >  > OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
>  >  >
>  >  > blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
>  >  > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >
>  >  > "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
>  >  >
>  >  > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >
>  >
>
>
>
>  --
>  Paul Fremantle
>  Co-Founder and VP of Technical Sales, WSO2
>  OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
>
>  blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>  "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to