+0

If we move to JDK 1.5 and start using generics on exposed interfaces (like
Axiom), then customers will need to move up to Java 1.5.

Thanks,

Rich Scheuerle
IBM Web Services
Apache Axis2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
512-838-5115  (IBM TL 678-5115)


                                                                       
             Davanum Srinivas                                          
             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                         
             m>                                                         To
                                       axis-dev@ws.apache.org          
             02/27/2008 08:33                                           cc
             AM                                                        
                                                                   Subject
                                       Re: [Axis2] Moving Axis2 code base
             Please respond to         into JDK 1.5                    
             [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                         
                   e.org                                               
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jeff,

yep. All 3 points are status quo w.r.t Axis2 1.3.

- -- dims

Jeff Barrett wrote:
| Hi Folks,
|
| If we choose to stay on 1.4, remember that JAXWS requires Java 1.5 (due
to
| the spec-required use of generics).  I think there are a couple of
modules
| that require Java 1.5 to build.  Also note that in order to run the JAXWS
| 2.1 TCK, that will also require Java 1.5 since the TCK will test the use
| of generics.
|
| So, staying on Java 1.4 and supporting JAXWS probably means something
| like:
| - We have to be building with Java 1.5  to get JAXWS built
| - We state that Axis2 can be run on 1.4 without JAXWS (as was true in the
| past)
| - To use Axis2 with JAXWS, you have to use Java 1.5
|
| Thanks,
| Jeff
|
| IBM Software Group - WebSphere Web Services Development
| Phone: 512-838-4587 or Tie Line 678-4587
| Internet e-mail and Sametime ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
|
|
| "Jeremy Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| 02/27/2008 05:15 AM
| Please respond to
| axis-dev@ws.apache.org
|
|
| To
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| cc
| "axis-dev@ws.apache.org" <axis-dev@ws.apache.org>
| Subject
| Re: [Axis2] Moving Axis2 code base into JDK 1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
| +1 to moving to Java 5. I think maintenance releases could be key in
| keeping those users tied to Java 1.4, interested in Axis2 until
| they're ready to move up to Java 5 themselves.
|
| Jeremy
|
| On 27/02/2008, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> Yes I guess that makes sense.
|>  However, its most likely that we would roll up whatever is in the
| trunk.
|>  I guess that there might be also end up being a 1.4.1 maintenance
|>  release as well.
|>
|>
|>  Paul
|>
|>
|>  On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Michele Mazzucco
|>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|>  > Paul,
|>  >
|>  >  if so, I think release 1.4 should focus on fixing as much bugs as
|>  >  possible, not on adding new features.
|>  >
|>  >  Michele
|>  >
|>  >
|>  >
|>  >  On 27 Feb 2008, at 09:59, Paul Fremantle wrote:
|>  >
|>  >  > My concern is that I think there has been a lot of work done since
| the
|>  >  > last release and the JDK1.4 users will never get that benefit.
|>  >  >
|>  >  > So - how about this for a plan.
|>  >  >
|>  >  > Release 1.4 asap based on JDK 1.4.
|>  >  > Then do a 1.5 release *very soon after* based on JDK1.5.
|>  >  >
|>  >  > That way even the names match :)
|>  >  >
|>  >  > Axis2 1.4 can be the last major release targeted at JDK1.4.
|>  >  >
|>  >  > As for 1.5, I think in fact it will need two releases - once we
| start
|>  >  > targeting 1.5 we probably need to do some 1.5 specific stuff like
|>  >  > generating code that takes advantage of generics.
|>  >  >
|>  >  > Paul
|>  >  >
|>  >  > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 6:28 AM, Dennis Sosnoski
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|>  >  > wrote:
|>  >  >>  From my experiences working with companies moving to Axis2 I'd
| say
|>  >  >>  about half are still using JDK 1.4. If they can't count on that
|>  >  >> support
|>  >  >>  being maintained I think they're likely to reconsider adopting
|>  >  >> Axis2.
|>  >  >>  Just having an archived 1.3 version of Axis2 won't be enough to
|>  >  >> convince
|>  >  >>  them, unless they're already committed to moving to JDK 1.5
| anyway.
|>  >  >>
|>  >  >>  It seems like bad timing to give up one of the major advantages
|>  >  >> of Axis2
|>  >  >>  over the Glassfish code and such. So -0 from me.
|>  >  >>
|>  >  >>   - Dennis
|>  >  >>
|>  >  >>  --
|>  >  >>  Dennis M. Sosnoski
|>  >  >>  SOA and Web Services in Java
|>  >  >>  Axis2 Training and Consulting
|>  >  >>  http://www.sosnoski.com - http://www.sosnoski.co.nz
|>  >  >>  Seattle, WA +1-425-939-0576 - Wellington, NZ +64-4-298-6117
|>  >  >>
|>  >  >>
|>  >  >>
|>  >  >>
|>  >  >>
|>  >  >>  Deepal Jayasinghe wrote:
|>  >  >>> Hi all ,
|>  >  >>>
|>  >  >>> As you might remember few months back Glen asked the list about
|>  >  >>> moving
|>  >  >>> to JDK 1.5 and I think we got very positive feedback. So I
|>  >  >>> thought of
|>  >  >>> asking again and change the code to work with JDK 1.5 . The main
|>  >  >>> reason behind sending this mail is due the dependency we have
| for
|>  >  >>> annogen. As I can see that project is dead one and there is no
|>  >  >>> development happening so I do not think it is a good idea to
|>  >  >>> depend on
|>  >  >>> such a project. In the meantime we have few issues with annogen
| as
|>  >  >>> well ,first  inner class problem (I have locally fixed that both
| in
|>  >  >>> Axis2 and Annogen will commit soon) , second is the final class
|>  >  >>> problem. I request a release from annogen after the changes that
|>  >  >>> Dims
|>  >  >>> did , but we did not get any reply so far.
|>  >  >>>
|>  >  >>> We all know that we get better annotation support from JDK 1.5
| so if
|>  >  >>> we move to JDK 1.5 we can get rid of the annogen dependency and
|>  >  >>> we can
|>  >  >>> just use JDK for annotation processing.  Other problem is
| generic
|>  >  >>> support , if we move to JDK 1.5 we can have generic support in
| our
|>  >  >>> POJOs.  In addition to POJO we can get better concurrent support
| in
|>  >  >>> JDK 1.5 as well.
|>  >  >>>
|>  >  >>> So if we move to JDK 1.5 we can get better support , and I do
| not
|>  >  >>> think any advantage of staying in 1.4 . If some user want to use
|>  >  >>> Axis2
|>  >  >>> in JDK 1.4 they can happily use Axis2 1.3 , which is very stable
|>  >  >>> version and working fine in 1.4 and 1.5.
|>  >  >>>
|>  >  >>> If any user or developers have any concern on moving to JDK 1.5
|>  >  >>> please
|>  >  >>> come forward and reply to this mail that will be very helpful
| for
|>  >  >>> all
|>  >  >>> of us.
|>  >  >>>
|>  >  >>> Here is my +1 for moving to JDK 1.5 to and release Axis2 1.4 in
|>  >  >>> JDK 1.5
|>  >  >>>
|>  >  >>> Thank you,
|>  >  >>> Deepal
|>  >  >>>
|>  >  >>>
|>  >  >>>
| --------------------------------------------------------------------
|>  >  >>> -
|>  >  >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>  >  >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>  >  >>>
|>  >  >>
|>  >  >>
|>  >  >>
| ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|>  >  >>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>  >  >>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>  >  >>
|>  >  >>
|>  >  >
|>  >  >
|>  >  >
|>  >  > --
|>  >  > Paul Fremantle
|>  >  > Co-Founder and VP of Technical Sales, WSO2
|>  >  > OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
|>  >  >
|>  >  > blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
|>  >  > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>  >  >
|>  >  > "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
|>  >  >
|>  >  >
| ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|>  >  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>  >  > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>  >  >
|>  >
|>  >
|>  > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|>  >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>  >  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>  >
|>  >
|>
|>
|>
|>  --
|>  Paul Fremantle
|>  Co-Founder and VP of Technical Sales, WSO2
|>  OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
|>
|>  blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
|>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>
|>  "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
|>
|>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>
|>
|
| ---------------------------------------------------------------------
| To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
|
|
|
| ---------------------------------------------------------------------
| To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)

iD8DBQFHxXTRgNg6eWEDv1kRAj/zAJwI2YhqdbFLXp9+PTaH9tWGKF/BzQCg6SOW
WJhsDffNlUFzv8zPmbrgVPA=
=EkRD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<<inline: graycol.gif>>

<<inline: pic19614.gif>>

<<inline: ecblank.gif>>

Reply via email to