Hi,
I have a web service that is returning XML... it's schema type is xsd:any. I
would expect the content to be returned as follows:
HTTP/1.0 200 OK
Content-Type: text/xml
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<soapenv:Envelope>
<soapenv:Body>
...
</soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>
I would expect this to be returned whether MTOM is enabled or not. Wouldn't
you?
Here's the response from Axis2 service when MTOM is disabled in the Axis2.conf
server config file:
HTTP/1.0 200 OK
Proxy-Connection: close
X-Powered-By: Servlet 2.4; JBoss-4.2.1.GA (build: SVNTag=JBoss_4_2_1_GA
date=200707131605)/Tomcat-5.5
X-Cache-Lookup: MISS from inetgw04.unx.sas.com:80
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:10:23 GMT
X-Cache: MISS from inetgw04.unx.sas.com
Content-Type: text/xml;charset=UTF-8
Server: Apache-Coyote/1.1
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";>
<soapenv:Body>
.....
</soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>
Looks correct.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's the response from Axis2 service when MTOM is enabled in the Axis2.conf
server config file:
HTTP/1.0 200 OK
Proxy-Connection: close
X-Powered-By: Servlet 2.4; JBoss-4.2.1.GA (build: SVNTag=JBoss_4_2_1_GA
date=200707131605)/Tomcat-5.5
X-Cache-Lookup: MISS from inetgw04.unx.sas.com:80
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:27:29 GMT
X-Cache: MISS from inetgw04.unx.sas.com
Content-Type: multipart/related;
boundary=MIMEBoundaryurn_uuid_93D2E13819F92A45691212524849948;
type="application/xop+xml"; start="0.urn:uuid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
start-info="text/xml"
Server: Apache-Coyote/1.1
--MIMEBoundaryurn_uuid_93D2E13819F92A45691212524849948
Content-Type: application/xop+xml; charset=UTF-8; type="text/xml"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
Content-ID: <0.urn:uuid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";>
<soapenv:Body>
....
</soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>
Why use multipart/related content type when there are no attachments? That is,
why make an attachment out of the SOAP envelope itself when there are no real
attachments? Is this correct behavior?
I'd like to hear your comments.
Thanks.
Tony Dean
SAS Institute Inc.
919.531.6704
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SAS... The Power to Know
http://www.sas.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
