Hi, I have a Flash/Flex consumer that is not working properly because it > cannot handle multipart/related content type. It is treating the post > response, mime boundary and all, as the soap envelope. > > > > It seems that enableMTOM=optional is not fail proof since a client can be > optimized not to send MTOM if there are no outgoing attachements. > Yeah... I know it's not ideal, but I think above is a good compromise for both the scenerio's..
Ideal way would be to use MTOM policy if somebody needs this much of precision... > I guess my best solution is to enable MTOM at the service operation > level only when I know that a particular operation will return an > attachment. > > I assume you do this as follows: > > <service name=""? > > <description>…</description> > > <operation name="…"> > > <messageReceiver class="…"/> > > <parameter name="enableMTOM">true</parameter> > > </operation> > > … > > </service> > Above is the correct way to enable/disable MTOM per operation wise. > This way I will return MTOM only if attachments are in the response; > otherwise, contentType=text/xml will be returned when no attachments are > present. Does this sound right? > Nope... MIME envelope will be there in the respose message irrespective of whether there is an attachment or not :(.. thanks, Thilina > > > Thanks. > > > > > > *From:* Thilina Gunarathne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Thursday, June 05, 2008 2:58 AM > *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [Axis2] response content > > > > Is it whether my following reply did not answer ur questions or whether you > simply missed it.. > http://markmail.org/message/lt65mrgnkr7egqjk > > The earlier mails in axis-dev related to this... > http://markmail.org/message/rrtsu7x22pkwya2e > > IMHO I do not think this as a much of a limitation given that users can > enable MTOM per operation wise and also they can use "optional" for > enableMTOM.. > > thanks, > Thilina > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Tony Dean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anyone have any answers to the question below. Thanks. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tony Dean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 4:41 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [Axis2] response content > > > > Hi, > > > > I have a web service that is returning XML... it's schema type is > > xsd:any. I would expect the content to be returned as follows: > > > > HTTP/1.0 200 OK > > Content-Type: text/xml > > > > <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?> > > <soapenv:Envelope> > > <soapenv:Body> > > ... > > </soapenv:Body> > > </soapenv:Envelope> > > > > > > I would expect this to be returned whether MTOM is enabled or not. > > Wouldn't you? > > > > > > Here's the response from Axis2 service when MTOM is disabled in the > > Axis2.conf server config file: > > > > HTTP/1.0 200 OK > > Proxy-Connection: close > > X-Powered-By: Servlet 2.4; JBoss-4.2.1.GA <http://jboss-4.2.1.ga/>(build: > > SVNTag=JBoss_4_2_1_GA > > date=200707131605)/Tomcat-5.5 > > X-Cache-Lookup: MISS from > > inetgw04.unx.sas.com:80<http://inetgw04.unx.sas.com/> > > Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:10:23 GMT > > X-Cache: MISS from inetgw04.unx.sas.com > > Content-Type: text/xml;charset=UTF-8 > > Server: Apache-Coyote/1.1 > > > > <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?> > > <soapenv:Envelope > > xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";> > > <soapenv:Body> > > ..... > > </soapenv:Body> > > </soapenv:Envelope> > > > > > > Looks correct. > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ------------------------------------------------- > > > > Here's the response from Axis2 service when MTOM is enabled in the > > Axis2.conf server config file: > > > > HTTP/1.0 200 OK > > Proxy-Connection: close > > X-Powered-By: Servlet 2.4; JBoss-4.2.1.GA <http://jboss-4.2.1.ga/>(build: > > SVNTag=JBoss_4_2_1_GA > > date=200707131605)/Tomcat-5.5 > > X-Cache-Lookup: MISS from > > inetgw04.unx.sas.com:80<http://inetgw04.unx.sas.com/> > > Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:27:29 GMT > > X-Cache: MISS from inetgw04.unx.sas.com > > Content-Type: multipart/related; > > boundary=MIMEBoundaryurn_uuid_93D2E13819F92A45691212524849948; > > type="application/xop+xml"; > > start="0.urn:uuid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"; > start- > > info="text/xml" > > Server: Apache-Coyote/1.1 > > > > --MIMEBoundaryurn_uuid_93D2E13819F92A45691212524849948 > > Content-Type: application/xop+xml; charset=UTF-8; type="text/xml" > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary > > Content-ID: <0.urn:uuid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?> > > <soapenv:Envelope > > xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";> > > <soapenv:Body> > > .... > > </soapenv:Body> > > </soapenv:Envelope> > > > > > > Why use multipart/related content type when there are no attachments? > > That is, why make an attachment out of the SOAP envelope itself when > > there are no real attachments? Is this correct behavior? > > > > I'd like to hear your comments. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Tony Dean > > SAS Institute Inc. > > 919.531.6704 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > SAS... The Power to Know > > http://www.sas.com > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -- > Thilina Gunarathne - http://thilinag.blogspot.com > -- Thilina Gunarathne - http://thilinag.blogspot.com
