Hi Glen, On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Glen Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A few quick comments: > > 1) I don't think things are as bad as some of this thread has implied. > There are always ebbs and flows of time and effort on projects, and although > there ARE a lot of open JIRAs, etc, it's not as if nothing has been getting > done - for instance, 1.4.1 wasn't very long ago at all! That said, it is > certainly true that regardless of the structure we end up with, it would be > great if we could tighten our focus, reduce the JIRA count, and generally > move towards higher quality across the project(s). Exactly. There is nothing new a TLP will help us to improve our project. > > > 2) I do still think a separate TLP is a good idea for Axis and its > subordinate technologies - in other words things that ONLY work with Axis2, > like a) modules, and b) transports. I think commonly used libraries like > XmlSchema and Axiom and Neethi should remain in WS, since they're also used > outside of Axis2 by Abdera, CXF, etc. etc. So basically I'm still pushing > for my original proposal. :) Why do you think it is needed? Some people argued here that it will improve the efficiency of the project, improve the JIRA count, etc.,. But you mentioned it will not be the case, in point 1) above. So why are you pushing for a new TLP? What will we gain? What if we stay as it is? The only advantage I see is that if we move to a new TLP, we will get a project which only has components related to Axis2. That is a nice to have thing than a big advantage. In that case, why do we wanna leave Axiom and XmlSchema? Thanks, Chinthaka
