See <RJS> below. Thanks for your help Sam.
Rich Scheuerle
XML & Web Services Development
512-838-5115 (IBM TL 678-5115)
Sam
Ruby/Raleigh/IBM@ To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IBMUS cc:
Subject: Re: AXIS/SOAP Interop Test
Summary
02/06/2002 12:50
PM
Please respond to
axis-dev
R J Scheuerle wrote:
>
> i) Sending type="ArrayOfSOAPStruct" over the wire may be 'more correct'
but
> is less interoperable. So I think we should continue to send type
="soapenc:Array"
> over the wire...but I will make a comment in the array serializer
explainly the
> pro's and con's.
+1
Ain't this fun? ;-)
<RJS> Done and committed </RJS>
> ii) The array deserializer should be changed so that we could accept
> returns like kSOAP's above. This kind of return should be reflected in
our TestDeser
> tests.
+1
> iii) Change the array deserializer to use the specific type= information
if
> provided. (See 3 below).
+0
<RJS> Actually ii) and iii) are very similar. I am going to do some more
investigation. </RJS>
(iv) below is certainly a necessary prerequisite for this to work, and
might even be sufficient...
> iv) Change our echoTest deploy.wsdd to include type mapping registration
of
> ArrayOfStruct.
+1
<RJS> Done and Committed </RJS>
- Sam Ruby
