Well, strictly speaking, "FOOBar" stays "FOOBar" if it's a class name but becomes "fOOBar" for a method name. Rather odd-looking, but it keeps the rules simple.
I'll take a look at your patch as I get the chance sometime in the next day or two. Thanks for the work! Russell Butek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dave Dunkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 02/11/2002 05:34:03 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: [PATCH] JavaUtils.xmlNameToJava() updates Here is a patch to bring JavaUtils.xmlNameToJava() in line with the JAX-RPC spec. Also attached is a junit test case for the method. The one case that I'm not sure about is what to do with "FOOBar." From my reading of the spec I would think the correct mapping would be "FOOBar" to "FOOBar" (and that's how I implemented it), but it might also be "fooBar." Dave Dunkin
