Thanks for doing this Russell and Dave.
Dave, do you believe we are 100% up to the spec now? -- Tom Jordahl Macromedia -----Original Message----- From: Russell Butek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 4:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCH] JavaUtils.xmlNameToJava() updates Dave, I just committed this (with a couple tweaks of my own). Thanks! Russell Butek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Russell Butek/Austin/IBM@IBMUS on 02/12/2002 08:12:01 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH] JavaUtils.xmlNameToJava() updates Well, strictly speaking, "FOOBar" stays "FOOBar" if it's a class name but becomes "fOOBar" for a method name. Rather odd-looking, but it keeps the rules simple. I'll take a look at your patch as I get the chance sometime in the next day or two. Thanks for the work! Russell Butek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dave Dunkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 02/11/2002 05:34:03 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: [PATCH] JavaUtils.xmlNameToJava() updates Here is a patch to bring JavaUtils.xmlNameToJava() in line with the JAX-RPC spec. Also attached is a junit test case for the method. The one case that I'm not sure about is what to do with "FOOBar." From my reading of the spec I would think the correct mapping would be "FOOBar" to "FOOBar" (and that's how I implemented it), but it might also be "fooBar." Dave Dunkin
