RE: SOAP Performance - What's next

[Sadiq, Waqar]

Title: RE: SOAP Performance - What's next

Yeah.  It looks good.  My point in that whatever it is the real performance boost will come from a binary XML format which makes the XML processing overhead insignificant.  Those who are concerned about building real-life enterprise applications with SOAP that can possible process high volume of transactions know that in the end performance will be a real barrier to adoption.     _______________________________________________ Waqar Sadiq   EDS EIT EASI - Enterprise Consultant MS: H3-4C-22 5400 Legacy Drive Plano, Texas 75024   phone: +01-972-797-8408 (8-837) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] fax: +01-972-605-4071 _______________________________________________     -----Original Message----- From: Volkmann, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:36 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: SOAP Performance - What's next   I've looked at DIME and think it's more complex than it needs to be. A simpler binary encoding of XML is BOX found at http://box.sourceforge.net. -----Original Message----- From:   Sadiq, Waqar [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:   Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:08 PM To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:        RE: SOAP Performance - What's next Has anyone looked at DIME at http://gotdotnet.com/team/xml_wsspecs/dime/default.aspx.  To me, it seems like the lack of a binary encoding format is the only thing that is going to make a performance difference. *************************************************************************************** WARNING: All e-mail sent to and from this address will be received or otherwise recorded by the A.G. Edwards corporate e-mail system and is subject to archival, monitoring or review by, and/or disclosure to, someone other than the recipient. ***************************************************************************************