One of the strengths of BOX (http://box.sourceforge.net) is that it doesn't require parsing of XML text on the receiving end. It can be rapidly decoded into either SAX events or a DOM tree without a standard XML parser.
-----Original Message-----
From: Anne Thomas Manes [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 5:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SOAP Performance - What's next
I don't think that the transport protocol will significantly affect overall
performance. The bottleneck is invariably in XML processing. That's where we
need to concentrate. In WASP we use a pull parser, which is faster than DOM
or SAX. But I'm sure we can think up even faster ways to process the
message.
Anne
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sadiq, Waqar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: SOAP Performance - What's next
>
>
> Has anyone looked at DIME at
> http://gotdotnet.com/team/xml_wsspecs/dime/default.aspx. To me, it seems
> like the lack of a binary encoding format is the only thing that
> is going to
> make a performance difference.
***************************************************************************************
WARNING: All e-mail sent to and from this address will be received or
otherwise recorded by the A.G. Edwards corporate e-mail system and is
subject to archival, monitoring or review by, and/or disclosure to,
someone other than the recipient.
***************************************************************************************
