+1 for #1 +0 for #2. Where did the extra ops come from and who added them?
-- Tom Jordahl -----Original Message----- From: R J Scheuerle Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Sam Ruby Subject: Proposal to change EchoTest (interop test) to be gen'd from wsdl The samples.echo service and artifacts are hand-crafted and committed code. Thus the stubs and artifacts are frequently out of date with the emitters and runtime. I propose changing the sample so that the service, stubs and beans are generated directly from the WSDL supplied by WhiteMesa (actually local copies of the WSDLs with our service stanzas added). I am implementing these changes in my sandbox, and I have come across 2 "problems": 1) The TestClient has two options which affect the setting of the soapAction. The emitted stub is hard-coded to use the soapAction specified in the wsdl (a good thing). So I propose eliminating these two options from TestClient...they are not used in our scripts anyway. 2) The current code has echoMap and echoMapArray operations. Neither of these are present in the white mesa wsdl document (and almost all of the remote services fail to implement these operations). I propose getting rid of these operations. If someone thinks they are useful, we should move them to another test. Any comments ? Could I get some +1's. Thanks, Rich Scheuerle XML & Web Services Development 512-838-5115 (IBM TL 678-5115)
