Steve I guess this isn't exactly your main point, but one aspect of WSIF we are very interested in is producing a non-Java (C, C++, C*) implementation. In particular, there has been some interest from Grid researchers in this.
Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Loughran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 9:52 PM Subject: Re: Proposed Contribution to Apache - WSIF > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 5:54 AM > Subject: Re: Proposed Contribution to Apache - WSIF > > > > > I'm thinking in terms of a separate PMC. > > > > These types of things always involve much more than anyone would > reasonably > > predict. The web site is the least of my concerns. The problem is that > > when you contemplate a change like this, people start revisiting and > > questioning every assumption. Should Axis be the code base? Should Axis > > be split up? Should xml-security be included? How about xml-rpc? Are > > there other code bases we should look to incorporate into the fold? > > Take a step back: should Java be the code base? It seems to me that C++, > Perl and even C# should be in there as and when appropriate. I can easily > imagine an assembly C# classes to provide interoperable implementations of > some of the more complex Java stuff, for example. > > What about REST based web services? There are indubitably things we can do > to improve that model of interaction; to help formalise it rather than make > it the generic 'call all post/get functionality a 'REST' service' > marketology we have today. > > More importantly, what role can Apache play in actually setting a roadmap > for web services? Currently it is implementing standards developed by > mainstream bodies (soap1.2 & w3c), but there is a definate trend in the web > service world for the WS-I to announce standards (c.f last week' > sauthentication announcement), under unclear IPR issues. > > I assume that the ibm.com folk (Sam included) are in-loop on the WS-I stuff, > but dont want Apache to end up at the bottom of the food chain for > implementation of strategic stuff (i.e. be relegated to the client side > library for commercial SOAP server products), and it is important for all > the development community to be aware of what is going on. > > Apache could work with this group explicitly, but I have to start worrying > about any IPR issues; we dont want a repeat of the (hopefully now resolved) > Jakarta/JCP situation. > > > > > What is the vision, mission, and goals of the new project? > > > > My intent at the moment is just to plan a seed so that it can possibly > > germinate later. These are excellent things to pursue after an Axis has a > > release. Meanwhile, I'd prefer that these considerations not derail > > discussions as to whether or not there is general interest in WSIF as a > > technology within Apache. > > -Steve >
