Dug What do you think? I proposed xml-axis-wsif, because I know that there is some view of Axis as "brand" for apache web services. WSIF isn't really an XML project (it can call non-xml systems) and it isnt really a sub-project of Axis as it is today. In a way I'd rather see a number of web services components that work together, but on the other hand I'd also like to get the CVS tree set up this month :-)
Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 5:36 PM Subject: Re: WSIF proposal > If the package name is org.apache.wsif (not org.apache.axis.wsif) why would > the tree be named xml-axis-wsif instead of just xml-wsif? > -Dug > > > "Paul Fremantle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/15/2002 10:30:04 AM > > Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > cc: > Subject: WSIF proposal > > > > > > Folks > > We have done the updates to WSIF to get it to work with Axis beta 2. We > are still working on the build changes to make the build more modular. > > I would like to set up a CVS tree to post this work, and so we can post > this and carry on the build work in the public space. > > To do this, I'd like votes please on: > > cvs tree name: > > proposal: xml-axis-wsif > > package name: > > proposal: org.apache.wsif.* > > Once we get this resolved I'll post this asap. > > Thanks > Paul > > > > >
