Dims If we are going to move to an overall WebServices story, I'd rather not name the package org.apache.axis.wsif.*
Apart from the length :-) I'd prefer that we kept a simple package name. Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: "Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 1:00 PM Subject: Re: WSIF proposal > Sanjiva, > > I agree that Web Services needs its own top level project. But we don't have enough "stuff" to do > so. IMHO we need more initiatives targeting various portions of the Web Services protocol stack > before we can do so. Using Axis as an incubator is a step in that direction. > > Thanks, > dims > > --- Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What do you think? I proposed xml-axis-wsif, because I know that there is > > > some view of Axis as "brand" for apache web services. WSIF isn't really an > > > > I don't agree that Axis is a brand for Apache Web services! Axis > > as created as the Apache SOAP replacement project and I continue to > > support it as the next gen Apache SOAP implementation. > > > > I don't think it would make any sense to say that all Apache Web > > services things are named org.apache.axis.<stuff>. > > > > I agree with Sam that Web services needs its own top level project. XML > > is very much a part of Web services, as is a bunch of stuff from Jakarta. > > > > Sanjiva. > > > > > > > ===== > Davanum Srinivas - http://xml.apache.org/~dims/ > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience > http://launch.yahoo.com
