I'll have a look, however I am not doing much in there anyway, integrating what I originaly wrote should be straight forward since I am simply spitting some code before and after invoke in the Stub.
Sylvain. -----Original Message----- From: Russell Butek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 2:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: too many "inactive" committers Perhaps I can help you understand the WSDL2Java refactoring. And if you have ideas on making it better, I'm all ears. I'm still not done with it (in fact, I'm working on my second round as I type this, which I'm hoping to present to axis-dev this week if my other tasks don't intrude too much). Start with the WSDL2 Parser part of the integration guide; then get in touch with me if you have more questions. Russell Butek [EMAIL PROTECTED] "St-Germain, Sylvain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/29/2002 12:50:08 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: RE: too many "inactive" committers Sure. It will need some work though, I haven't had a look yet at the WSDL2Java refactoring. It is one of the area that I have modified. Sylvain. -----Original Message----- From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 1:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: too many "inactive" committers Sylvain, Can you please submit a "cvs diff -u" against the latest CVS to jumpstart discussion again? Thanks, dims --- "St-Germain, Sylvain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > See Inline. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Jordahl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 6:18 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: too many "inactive" committers > > > > Sylvain, > > What are you waiting for feedback on at this point? > Did you hash out an acceptable design with Glen? If so, check it in. > > [sylvain] I do not know precisely, Glen proposed to come back to me with > design issues, which he apparently did not yet have the time to do. > > Why are you "about to give up"? > > [sylvain] If I cannot get basic soap:header support derived from the WSDL, > axis (in its current form) is of no use to me. If this happen, I would have > to maintain my own branch of Axis which defeats the purpose of OpenSource. > > Just a hint, if you haven't heard anything in a month, it probably is off > the scope for 99% of normal busy committers. :-) > > [sylvain] Understand, that too explains why there is not yet support for > soap:header from the WSDL ;-) > > We want you to contribute, unless you get a -1, don't let us get in your > way! :-) > > [sylvain] I appreciate, it is just that I find that the level of > collaboration drastically went down after I submitted my second proposal. > This should not be specially now that there is code to look at, the > committers should be able to clearly describe what is unacceptable so I can > move on. > > +1 for me as committers on soap support related issues. ;-) > > Sylvain. > > -----Original Message----- > From: St-Germain, Sylvain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 1:41 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: too many "inactive" committers > > > > About "...encourage more people to become active"... I have been active at > raising issues as an Axis user and usually got great feedback, this was > great and made me adopting Axis. > > Now that I want to contribute I find the committers quite silent. I have > been waiting at least a month now regarding soap header stuff... > > Am I hitting one of the limit of the Open Source process... > > Not having a question answered as a user is obviously not fun, having a > submitted feature sleeping in without appropriate feedback is worse. > > I have to admit that I am about to give up. > > Sylvain. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 11:10 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: too many "inactive" committers > > > No, I'm serious: I think it makes absolute sense to clean up > committer lists every once in a while- people become active > with the good intention of being active for ever. However, > reality beats them down often. > > Getting new blood flowing thru the project is critical to > good health IMO! > > Cutting out all the "sleeper" developers would highlight the > real status of the Axis committer community and hopefully > that'll encourage more people to become active. > > Sanjiva. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "R J Scheuerle Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:49 PM > Subject: Re: too many "inactive" committers > > > > I don't think its necessary to de-committerize you Sanjiva :-). > > > > Please stay! > > > > Rich Scheuerle > > XML & Web Services Development > > 512-838-5115 (IBM TL 678-5115) > > > > > > > > > > "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 05/27/2002 06:50 PM > > Please respond to axis-dev > > > > > > To: "Axis Development List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > cc: > > Subject: too many "inactive" committers > > > > > > > > I sense that there's concern that there are too many inactive > > committers on axis-dev. > > > > I'm definitely one of the culprits. I volunteer to become a non- > > committer to help reduce the "deadwood." Can someone please > > "de-committerize" me? > > > > Hopefully having fewer inactive committers will help get more > > "new blood" into this project. > > > > Sanjiva. > > > > > > > > > > > > This message may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you > have received this e-mail in error or are not the intended recipient, you > may not use, copy, disseminate or distribute it; do not open any > attachments, delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender > promptly by e-mail that you have done so. Thank you. > > This message may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you > have received this e-mail in error or are not the intended recipient, you > may not use, copy, disseminate or distribute it; do not open any > attachments, delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender > promptly by e-mail that you have done so. Thank you. ===== Davanum Srinivas - http://xml.apache.org/~dims/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com This message may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error or are not the intended recipient, you may not use, copy, disseminate or distribute it; do not open any attachments, delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender promptly by e-mail that you have done so. Thank you. This message may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error or are not the intended recipient, you may not use, copy, disseminate or distribute it; do not open any attachments, delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender promptly by e-mail that you have done so. Thank you.
