Sure.   It will need some work though, I haven't had a look yet at the
WSDL2Java refactoring.   It is one of the area that I have modified.  

Sylvain.

-----Original Message-----
From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 1:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: too many "inactive" committers


Sylvain,

Can you please submit a "cvs diff -u" against the latest CVS to jumpstart
discussion again? 

Thanks,
dims

--- "St-Germain, Sylvain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See Inline.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Jordahl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 6:18 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: too many "inactive" committers
> 
> 
> 
> Sylvain,
> 
> What are you waiting for feedback on at this point?
> Did you hash out an acceptable design with Glen?  If so, check it in.
> 
> [sylvain] I do not know precisely, Glen proposed to come back to me with
> design issues,  which he apparently did not yet have the time to do.
> 
> Why are you "about to give up"?
> 
> [sylvain] If I cannot get basic soap:header support derived from the WSDL,
> axis (in its current form) is of no use to me.  If this happen, I would
have
> to maintain my own branch of Axis which defeats the purpose of OpenSource.

> 
> Just a hint, if you haven't heard anything in a month, it probably is off
> the scope for 99% of normal busy committers. :-)  
> 
> [sylvain] Understand, that too explains why there is not yet support for
> soap:header from the WSDL ;-)
> 
> We want you to contribute, unless you get a -1, don't let us get in your
> way! :-)
> 
> [sylvain] I appreciate, it is just that I find that the level of
> collaboration drastically went down after I submitted my second proposal.
> This should not be specially now that there is code to look at, the
> committers should be able to clearly describe what is unacceptable so I
can
> move on.
> 
> +1 for me as committers on soap support related issues. ;-)
> 
> Sylvain.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: St-Germain, Sylvain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 1:41 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: too many "inactive" committers
> 
> 
> 
> About "...encourage more people to become active"... I have been active at
> raising issues as an Axis user and usually got great feedback, this was
> great and made me adopting Axis.  
> 
> Now that I want to contribute I find the committers quite silent.  I have
> been waiting at least a month now regarding soap header stuff...
> 
> Am I hitting one of the limit of the Open Source process... 
> 
> Not having a question answered as a user is obviously not fun, having a
> submitted feature sleeping in without appropriate feedback is worse.  
> 
> I have to admit that I am about to give up.
> 
> Sylvain. 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 11:10 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: too many "inactive" committers
> 
> 
> No, I'm serious: I think it makes absolute sense to clean up
> committer lists every once in a while- people become active
> with the good intention of being active for ever. However, 
> reality beats them down often. 
> 
> Getting new blood flowing thru the project is critical to
> good health IMO!
> 
> Cutting out all the "sleeper" developers would highlight the
> real status of the Axis committer community and hopefully 
> that'll encourage more people to become active.
> 
> Sanjiva.
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "R J Scheuerle Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:49 PM
> Subject: Re: too many "inactive" committers
> 
> 
> > I don't think its necessary to de-committerize you Sanjiva :-). 
> > 
> > Please stay!
> > 
> > Rich Scheuerle
> > XML & Web Services Development
> > 512-838-5115  (IBM TL 678-5115)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 05/27/2002 06:50 PM
> > Please respond to axis-dev
> > 
> >  
> >         To:     "Axis Development List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >         cc: 
> >         Subject:        too many "inactive" committers
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > I sense that there's concern that there are too many inactive
> > committers on axis-dev.
> > 
> > I'm definitely one of the culprits. I volunteer to become a non-
> > committer to help reduce the "deadwood." Can someone please
> > "de-committerize" me?
> > 
> > Hopefully having fewer inactive committers will help get more
> > "new blood" into this project.
> > 
> > Sanjiva.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> This message may contain privileged and/or confidential information.  If
you
> have received this e-mail in error or are not the intended recipient, you
> may not use, copy, disseminate or distribute it; do not open any
> attachments, delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender
> promptly by e-mail that you have done so.  Thank you.
> 
> This message may contain privileged and/or confidential information.  If
you
> have received this e-mail in error or are not the intended recipient, you
> may not use, copy, disseminate or distribute it; do not open any
> attachments, delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender
> promptly by e-mail that you have done so.  Thank you.


=====
Davanum Srinivas - http://xml.apache.org/~dims/

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com

This message may contain privileged and/or confidential information.  If you
have received this e-mail in error or are not the intended recipient, you
may not use, copy, disseminate or distribute it; do not open any
attachments, delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender
promptly by e-mail that you have done so.  Thank you.

Reply via email to