I say
+1 to getting the QName mess fixed up for Beta 3.
--
Tom
Jordahl
Macromedia
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 3:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: WSDL4J updated... [GLEN: PLEASE READ]
Hi Matt,From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 3:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: WSDL4J updated... [GLEN: PLEASE READ]
Thanks for the quick turnaround. I'm a bit concerned about the inclusion of the javax.xml.namespace.QName class in wsdl4j.jar. It seems to me that having it there might cause confusion. Can this class be excluded?
Axis-dev/Glen: I'm uptimisitcally going through and making the corresponding changes to Axis. I hope I will be allowed to commit them when done!
- Sam Ruby
