As release manager, and originator of the multiple-QNames issue, I wholeheartedly agree.
 
Sam, fire when ready!
 
--Glen
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Jordahl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 3:39 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: WSDL4J updated... [GLEN: PLEASE READ]

 
I say +1 to getting the QName mess fixed up for Beta 3.
 
--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 3:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: WSDL4J updated... [GLEN: PLEASE READ]

Hi Matt,

Thanks for the quick turnaround. I'm a bit concerned about the inclusion of the javax.xml.namespace.QName class in wsdl4j.jar. It seems to me that having it there might cause confusion. Can this class be excluded?

Axis-dev/Glen: I'm uptimisitcally going through and making the corresponding changes to Axis. I hope I will be allowed to commit them when done!

- Sam Ruby

Reply via email to