Hey Glen, On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 04:56:23PM -0400, Glen Daniels wrote: > > How about Call.setOperationName( "GET" ) or similar? > > Bear with me here, but this is one of the problems I have with this whole new MEP >thing. GET/POST/etc. are *HTTP* methods.
Sure, but they're the same as any other method that goes into Call.setOperationName(). i.e. they're application layer semantics. > Yes, it's called "WebMethod" in SOAP 1.2, but we all know that it's really about >using HTTP, and I think that does a disservice to the protocol-neutrality of SOAP. I >would much prefer something like Call.setIdempotentOperation(true), and then let the >binding figure out that in the HTTP case, that means you use GET. Did you get my reply[1] to Stuart, and Noah's "+1"? The method cannot be derived from the MEP. > I agree with Sam that there are still serious issues about how exactly you construct >useful URLs which mean useful things, but that's another issue. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Jul/0016.html MB -- Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.com
