Ant, Yes, you should not have to duplicate the JMS code in WSIF's axis-provider....Yes, Please take a look at the JMS Transport checked into Axis.
Thanks, dims --- Anthony Elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The axis provider works fine without any JMS classes at run time so I guess > you want one that can be built without JMS? > > It would be reasonably straight forward to create a new axis provider with > all the JMS code stripped out, but then there would be a lot of code > duplicated between the JMS and non-JMS axis providers. Nicer would be to > come up with some kind of pluggable transports architecture so the axis > provider could dynamically find and use a JMS transport if its available. > > I haven't been paying attention to the work going on with the AXIS JMS > transport, perhaps this has added functionality that wsif should be using > now? > > ...ant > > Anthony Elder > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > CICS/390 Change Team > IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park > (+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208. > > > Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 12/10/2002 01:23:38 > > Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: > Subject: [WSIF] Need JMS-free Axis Provider > > > > Folks, > > We need a JMS-free Axis Provider...Can someone help? > > Thanks, > dims > > ===== > Davanum Srinivas - http://xml.apache.org/~dims/ > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More > http://faith.yahoo.com > > > ===== Davanum Srinivas - http://xml.apache.org/~dims/ __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com
