Anthony, The Axis JMS transport should have the functionality you need for use in WSIF. It is possible however that WSIF adds requirements that were not included in our initial implementation of the transport. I would really appreciate if you or any of the other WSIF folks can help me to figure out the gap between the requirements imposed by WSIF and the current capabilities of the JMS transport. I would be happy to add any necessary features that we discover to the Axis JMS transport.
Thanks, Jaime Meritt Sonic Software Corporation -----Original Message----- From: Anthony Elder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 7:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSIF] Need JMS-free Axis Provider The axis provider works fine without any JMS classes at run time so I guess you want one that can be built without JMS? It would be reasonably straight forward to create a new axis provider with all the JMS code stripped out, but then there would be a lot of code duplicated between the JMS and non-JMS axis providers. Nicer would be to come up with some kind of pluggable transports architecture so the axis provider could dynamically find and use a JMS transport if its available. I haven't been paying attention to the work going on with the AXIS JMS transport, perhaps this has added functionality that wsif should be using now? ...ant Anthony Elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] CICS/390 Change Team IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park (+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208. Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 12/10/2002 01:23:38 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: [WSIF] Need JMS-free Axis Provider Folks, We need a JMS-free Axis Provider...Can someone help? Thanks, dims ===== Davanum Srinivas - http://xml.apache.org/~dims/ __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com
