+1 -- dims
--- Glen Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi folks! > > As discussed last week both on the list and in person with Sam & Tom, I'd like to >switch the > stubs back to the way they used to be, namely each stub having a single Call object >which gets > reused. So multiple threads can share a Service/Locator, but each stub should only >be used by > one thread. This is very intuitive, I think, and has several advantages: > > 1) Simplicity. The code in the stubs would become much cleaner and smaller, making >reading and > debugging easier > > 2) Ease of use. It becomes possible to rely on state changes in the stub, which >makes > stub.addHeader(), stub.getCall(), etc. possible > > 3) (related to 2) This would enable a richer future design for dealing with SOAP >extensions in a > user-friendly manner > > I asked for comments on this last week, but didn't hear anything. I'd like to move >forward with > this - can I get a +1? > > --Glen ===== Davanum Srinivas - http://xml.apache.org/~dims/ __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com
