FYI: We have code that depends on the current behavior and would prefer that it didn't change.
alan -----Original Message----- From: Mike Spreitzer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Stubs moving to single-threadedness I'm not going to cast an official vote, since I'm not an official contributor (just lurking here), but I'l de-lurk to point out that I do not consider the proposal to be intuitive. In general, "object" != "thread". From a user's point of view, the constraint that "each stub should only be used by one thread" is neither natural nor convenient in a general multi-threaded program. I have written multi-threaded distributed programs using other technologies (and I have conributed to other RPC technologies), and used stubs from more than one thread; the proposed constraint would just be an added pain in those programs.
