----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Jordahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 06:28 Subject: RE: wsdd question
> > +1 for "qname=" I'll +1 this too, then. Any more votes or shall I close this one with most of the electorate abstaining? NB, writing an XSD for the WSDD has shown some issues -xsd <sequence> enforces an order; good or bad we need to run with it in our examples -the XsdTest dims wrote is still failing, primarily because xerces doesnt like urn: as a namespace URI, even though it is quite clearly valid to human eyes. Its like xerces wants to turn the namespace into a URL and complains if it cant -It would benefit end users were we to put the xsd somewhere resolvable up on the web site. We already do, via the CVS access, but it would be easeir if the URI of the wsdd namespace actually resolved to the XSD file.
