+1 --- Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tom Jordahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 06:28 > Subject: RE: wsdd question > > > > > > +1 for "qname=" > > I'll +1 this too, then. > > Any more votes or shall I close this one with most of the electorate > abstaining? > > NB, writing an XSD for the WSDD has shown some issues > > -xsd <sequence> enforces an order; good or bad we need to run with it in our > examples > > -the XsdTest dims wrote is still failing, primarily because xerces doesnt > like urn: as a namespace URI, even though it is quite clearly valid to human > eyes. Its like xerces wants to turn the namespace into a URL and complains > if it cant > > -It would benefit end users were we to put the xsd somewhere resolvable up > on the web site. We already do, via the CVS access, but it would be easeir > if the URI of the wsdd namespace actually resolved to the XSD file. > > >
===== Davanum Srinivas - http://xml.apache.org/~dims/ __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site http://webhosting.yahoo.com
