That's a strong viewpoint from an IBMer. Maybe that's because the package came from IBM, perhaps?
I can count you as one user, but not buying the expression "Lots." Any comments? So I can increase the counter, two, three, ... :-) pae ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anthony Elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 12:27 PM Subject: Re: WSIF - Is it dead? > > No WSIF isn't dead! Lots of people are using it. > > Probably the biggest most recent example is the quite high profile it took > in the announcement of IBM's latest version of WebSphere this week, see: > http://www.aspnews.com/strategies/companies/article/0,2350,10576_1547561,00. html > http://www.ibm.com/software/info1/websphere/index.jsp?tab=news/ibmnews/pr112 502&S_TACT=102BBW01&S_CMP=campaign > > I think one of the reasons WSIF doesn't get many questions on the AXIS > lists is that people still seem to use the old alphaWorks discussion group > (http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/forum/wsif.nsf) for questions. I've asked > alphaWorks to update the WSIF page to point to Apache but it hasn't happen > yet. > > I encourage you to keep on using it, as far as I know there is nothing else > available that has similar functionality. > > ...ant > > Anthony Elder > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Web Services Development > IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park > (+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208. > > > easter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 29/11/2002 16:26:42 > > Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: > Subject: WSIF - Is it dead? > > > > I've noticed since my subscription to this list, that no-one at all > seems to use WSIF, or (less likely) it's too well documented and > bug-free to warrant any > mailing list discussions. > > Is there something else I should be using instead? Is it going to go away? > > I've found nothing else which allows me to generically and dynamically > connect 2 web services together using nothing > more than their WSDL descriptions. > I feel since I seem to be the only one on the planet to do this, perhaps > I'm doing something wrong? > > Cheers. > WH > > > >
