Correct. Generic JMS stuff is OK to have in the JAR, but any vendor-specific stuff like Sonic/IBM/etc is not, at least as far as I'm concerned. Other opinions?
--Glen > -----Original Message----- > From: Jaime Meritt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 3:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: JMS transport not in 1.1 binary distribution > > > Glen, > > Great, thanks a lot for the help. To get the SonicMQVendorAdapter to > build you will need the SonicMQ client jars available as > well. What is > the current policy on third party library dependencies? Does > the binary > distribution include all options or just the default packages? If it > includes all options, I can send you Sonic client libraries for build > purposes. If not, I am assuming the solution is to have users build > from the source distribution. > > Thanks, > Jaime > > -----Original Message----- > From: Glen Daniels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 2:14 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: JMS transport not in 1.1 binary distribution > > > Actually, I did (JRun's), and have no idea why it wasn't in there. > > I'll rebuild and repost, though, as beta2. We should get 1.1 up to > speed and out soon! > > --Glen > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tom Jordahl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 2:11 PM > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Subject: RE: JMS transport not in 1.1 binary distribution > > > > > > Jaime, > > > > The release builds are built by the release manager (in > > 1.1beta1, that was Glen) and this person has to have all of > > the jar files around to get the right build thing to happen. > > > > My guess is that Glen did NOT have a JMS jar on his system > > when building 1.1. > > > > -- > > Tom Jordahl > > Macromedia Server Development > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jaime Meritt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 1:24 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: JMS transport not in 1.1 binary distribution > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I just got an email from a user alerting me to the fact that the JMS > > transport classes are not included in the binary > distribution for the > > Axis 1.1 beta. It is however available in the source > > distribution. Can > > anyone shed some light on this? I would imagine that the > JMS classes > > were unavailable when the distribution was built. Who can > modify the > > build classpath? > > > > Thanks, > > Jaime > > --- > > Jaime Meritt > > Manager, Software Engineering > > Sonic Software Corporation > > 400 Technology Square > > Progress Software Suite > > Cambridge, MA 02139 > > Phone: 617-551-6613 > > > > >
