----- Original Message ----- From: "Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 05:11 Subject: RE: JMS transport not in 1.1 binary distribution
> My idea of Jar-Hell :( Just like DLL's/SharedObject's Hell. The problem with DLL-hell is (a) the search path (windows, system, rest of path) (b) the COM registry (c) no versioned binding. Now Windows, what, 3.x, was worse in that you could only have one DLL in memory called 'hook.dll' or 'clock.dll'; anything like that loaded and your app would get a handle to the existing one, even if it had nothing to do with your own hook.dll. That was *really* bogus. Drop in libs work, if done nicely, where that means the classpath is handled right.
