Actually, it could matter if you are trying to achieve interoperability. Did you generate your code from the WSDL? Did you tell the service to use your WSDL file rather than an auto-generated one?
Anne On 7/4/05, Sebastian Beigel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using a document-style web service and the request contains an array > of objects in the form: > > <users><user>...</user><user>...</user></users> > > defined by (from my WSDL-file): > > <element name="users"> > <complexType> > <sequence> > <element maxOccurs="unbounded" minOccurs="0" name="user" > type="impl:User"/> > </sequence> > </complexType> > </element> > > Requests sent by the generated junit tests are constructed in the > desired format but looking at > http://localhost:8080/foo/services/FooUsers?WSDL results in: > > <element name="users"> > <complexType> > <sequence> > <element maxOccurs="unbounded" minOccurs="0" name="item" > type="impl:User"/> > </sequence> > </complexType> > </element> > > So, the inner element's name is "item" instead of "user". > > This makes no difference (as it seems that you can name this inner > element as you like?!) but I would really appreciate the "correctness" > of the generated WSDL (thinking about validation...) > > Any ideas or am I missing something? > > Please Cc me since I'm not subscribed to the list. > > Regards, > Sebastian > > -- > Sebastian Beigel // Software Architekt > (F) Die Firma GmbH // Innovative Kommunikation > Schwalbacher Straße 74 // D-65183 Wiesbaden > T +49.6 11.2 38 50.24 // F +49.6 11.2 38 50.11 > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.diefirma.de > >
