yes i know. however I have a customer that insists it
should be "soap", so I am gathering up some rebuttals. i thought if maybe
most folks used something, then maybe....
-SP
From: Simon Fell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 12:58 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: SOAP namespacing conventions
they are all sematically equivilent, the actual prefix used
carries no weight.
Cheers
Simon
From: Steve Pruitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 6:27 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: SOAP namespacing conventions
Is there is a "standard" or "widely accepted"
convention for naming the soap namespace.
I
have seen:
<soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<soapenv:Envelope
xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<SOAP-ENV:Envelope
xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
Thanks,
-Steve
Pruitt
